Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Proposal to reject the text

Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
105 for · 529 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:07
More facts (5)
Position
vote 1 of 320 on the decision
Official label
A10-0197/2025 – Jörgen Warborn – Proposal for rejection – Am 120
Text
Report A-10-2025-0197
Dossier
2025/0045(COD)
Vote id
180983
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 105 for, 529 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 13Against 109Abst. 0No vote 14 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 1Against 170Abst. 1No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 8 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 5Against 16Abst. 4No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 639 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Dec 2025Proposal to reject the text Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection117 for, 540 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.95 601 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment96 for, 549 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 580 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.90 509 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 23 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment104 for, 485 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 552 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 14 Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefireAmendment92 for, 427 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 474 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 508 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 87 to paragraph 52 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment106 for, 489 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 551 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 124 to Article 19, After paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 22 in am 120) Generalised scheme of tariff preferencesAmendment95 for, 551 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 585 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 50 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment94 for, 559 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 584 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 508 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/180983
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Proposal to reject the text — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 180983, reference 2025/0045(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/180983 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-180983,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/180983}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/180983},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180983, reference 2025/0045(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}