Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote

Conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction

Vote
Final vote
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 13 Nov 2025
Result
454 for · 172 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
13 November 2025, 11:06
More facts (6)
Effect
Passed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 2 on the decision
Official label
A10-0205/2025 – Michal Wiezik – Commission proposal and amendments
Text
Report A-10-2025-0205
Dossier
2025/0090(COD)
Vote id
180954
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 454 for, 172 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 124Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 64Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 160Against 2Abst. 11No vote 15 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 7Against 61Abst. 5No vote 6 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.75
PatriotsFor 0Against 75Abst. 1No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 12Against 11Abst. 2No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Germany1400
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland200
France1200
Greece300
Croatia400
Hungary200
Italy1700
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta200
Netherlands400
Poland200
Portugal800
Romania900
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 73

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 73 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 581 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 580 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 585 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 553 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 557 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 59 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 586 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 519 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment452 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 586 voters
9 Oct 2025Recital D — part 2 Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in CabaretSplit vote434 for, 161 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 553 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 521 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/180954
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote — Conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction”. Vote, 13 November 2025. votingId 180954, reference 2025/0090(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/180954 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 13 November 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-11-13/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-11-13-180954,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote — Conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-11-13},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/180954}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-11-13/180954},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180954, reference 2025/0090(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-11-13-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-11-13 (CC BY 4.0)}
}