Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuels

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 23 Oct 2025
Result
175 for · 374 against · 25 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
23 October 2025, 13:05
More facts (7)
Effect
Objection failed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 2 of 2 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens, Patriots
Official label
B10-0464/2025 – Motion for a resolution
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0457
Dossier
2025/2809(DEA)
Vote id
180291
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 175 for, 374 against, 25 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Objection failed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 32Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
GreensFor 0Against 45Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 105Abst. 0No vote 31 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 59Abst. 1No vote 15 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
EPPFor 4Against 126Abst. 17No vote 41 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 63Against 0Abst. 6No vote 16 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 7Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium040
Bulgaria010
Germany0100
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain0190
Finland020
France090
Greece010
Croatia030
Ireland010
Italy0160
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta020
Netherlands030
Poland020
Portugal070
Romania050
Sweden050
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 574 members

No vote recorded, 145

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 145 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 2, adding text after recital 10 Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported from the Russian Federation and the Republic of BelarusAmendment176 for, 380 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 491 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 426 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 483 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 5 to recital N EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment191 for, 448 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 533 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.93 378 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 518 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 535 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 535 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 537 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 38 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 458 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 531 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 527 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180291
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuels”. Vote, 23 October 2025. votingId 180291, reference 2025/2809(DEA). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180291 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-23-180291,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from low-carbon fuels}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180291}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180291},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180291, reference 2025/2809(DEA). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}