Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 78 — part 2

UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)

Vote
Paragraph 78 — part 2
Result
337 for · 218 against · 18 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
23 October 2025, 13:21
More facts (6)
Position
vote 23 of 51 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
B10-0445/2025 – § 78/2
Vote id
180263
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 337 for, 218 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 59 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘stresses the importance of further measures to support the electrification of road transport as a way of reducing road transport emissions, in conjunction with further measures supporting the modal shift, intermodal transport and public transport in general; calls on the Commission to include emissions from international transport in NDCs; is concerned by the fact that the Commission’s 2025 NECP assessment report showed that some Member States still have support schemes for fossil-fuel powered vehicles and calls on those Member States to phase them out;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 44Against 1Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 104Against 1Abst. 0No vote 31 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 54Against 5Abst. 4No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.79
EPPFor 84Against 57Abst. 5No vote 42 of 188Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ECRFor 0Against 64Abst. 0No vote 15 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 18 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 11Against 12Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.28
No groupFor 4Against 13Abst. 9No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria410
Belgium210
Bulgaria014
Cyprus100
Czechia500
Germany2440
Denmark110
Estonia020
Spain1140
Finland400
France041
Greece200
Croatia040
Ireland400
Italy160
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands500
Poland6110
Portugal600
Romania620
Sweden300
Slovenia050
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 573 members

No vote recorded, 146

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 146 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Final vote Framework for achieving climate neutralityFinal379 for, 248 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.83 526 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 11, adding text after recital 8 — part 2 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment376 for, 248 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 521 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote378 for, 244 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 59 %r · shared0.81 525 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Referral back to committee Framework for achieving climate neutralityProcedural409 for, 221 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.80 525 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 38 to Article 1 — part 2 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment375 for, 242 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECR, Greensr · shared0.80 523 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on Article 1 Framework for achieving climate neutralitySeparate vote406 for, 222 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.80 520 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 14 to Article 1 — part 2 Framework for achieving climate neutralityAmendment384 for, 242 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 524 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 4 Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowancesAmendment391 for, 275 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 537 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively — Ams 1-10, 13, 18-25, 27-30, 32-35, 37, 40 Framework for achieving climate neutralityOther396 for, 229 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.77 526 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 4 Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sectorAmendment404 for, 202 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.77 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 78 — part 2 — UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)”. Vote, 23 October 2025. votingId 180263, reference 2025/2666(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180263 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 23 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-23/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-23-180263,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 78 — part 2 — UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-23},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180263}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-23/180263},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180263, reference 2025/2666(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-23-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-23 (CC BY 4.0)}
}