Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 67 — part 2

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections

Vote
Paragraph 67 — part 2
Result
417 for · 211 against · 11 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 14:47
More facts (5)
Position
vote 154 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0192/2025 – Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec – § 67/2
Vote id
180236
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 417 for, 211 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 65 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “with the aim of increasing funding to UNRWA given its vital role in delivering humanitarian aid and essential services like health and education to Palestinian refugees in Gaza and the wider region, to support reconstruction in Gaza, and to strengthen humanitarian and economic assistance in Syria, with support programmes addressing infrastructure reconstruction, accountability mechanisms, reinforcing the space for civil society and social stability in the country and to support ethnic and religious minorities in the Middle East;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 47Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 110Against 3Abst. 0No vote 23 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 57Against 10Abst. 2No vote 6 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
EPPFor 148Against 19Abst. 3No vote 18 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
ECRFor 1Against 69Abst. 0No vote 9 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 2No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 14Against 10Abst. 3No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1300
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia001
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 639 members

No vote recorded, 80

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 80 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Oct 2025Paragraph 16 — part 3 Renewing the EU-Africa partnership: building common priorities ahead of the Angola SummitSplit vote391 for, 175 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 551 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 4 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote430 for, 201 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.88 575 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote435 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.88 583 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 78 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote396 for, 182 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 554 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 108 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote419 for, 198 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.88 558 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 48 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote426 for, 202 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 568 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 47 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote444 for, 195 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.87 575 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.87 575 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 2 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote452 for, 194 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 594 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital BM Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote391 for, 202 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 559 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 67 — part 2 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 180236. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180236 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-180236,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 67 — part 2 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180236}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180236},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180236. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}