Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 67 — part 1

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections

Vote
Paragraph 67 — part 1
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 22 Oct 2025
Result
501 for · 143 against · 5 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 14:46
More facts (5)
Position
vote 153 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0192/2025 – Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec – § 67/1
Text
Report A-10-2025-0192
Vote id
180235
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 501 for, 143 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Underlines the importance of the Southern Neighbourhood line in supporting political, economic and social reforms in the region and in meeting increased humanitarian needs as well as for other purposes of regional cooperation; proposes to increase appropriations for the line by EUR 35 million above the DB,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 116Against 3Abst. 0No vote 17 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 64Against 8Abst. 0No vote 3 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 163Against 11Abst. 1No vote 13 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 58Against 11Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
PatriotsFor 1Against 79Abst. 0No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 1No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 12Against 11Abst. 3No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria150
Belgium030
Czechia080
Spain040
France0280
Greece010
Hungary0110
Italy080
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 70

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 70 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 596 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsSplit vote467 for, 100 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 529 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 29 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote506 for, 88 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.82 559 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 17 — part 1 European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2025Split vote544 for, 109 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 612 voters
8 Jul 2025Recital I — part 2 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote524 for, 128 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 610 voters
8 Jul 2025Paragraph 49 — part 3 Security of energy supply in the EUSplit vote535 for, 122 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 607 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Digitalisation, artificial intelligence and algorithmic management in the workplace – shaping the future of workSplit vote471 for, 137 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.80 598 voters
11 Feb 2025Paragraph 32 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Split vote494 for, 87 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 569 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 29 — part 3 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote498 for, 97 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Patriots, EPP, S&Dr · shared0.80 554 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote464 for, 99 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 81 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180235
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 67 — part 1 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 180235. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180235 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-180235,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 67 — part 1 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180235}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180235},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180235. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}