Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 172, after paragraph 79

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections

Vote
Amendment 172, after paragraph 79
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 22 Oct 2025
Result
254 for · 331 against · 72 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 14:50
More facts (5)
Position
vote 181 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0192/2025 – Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec – After § 79 – Am 172
Text
Report A-10-2025-0192
Vote id
180140
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 254 for, 331 against, 72 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 39 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 114Against 4Abst. 2No vote 16 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
RenewFor 6Against 65Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
EPPFor 1Against 175Abst. 0No vote 12 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 28Against 16Abst. 24No vote 11 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.12
PatriotsFor 1Against 39Abst. 40No vote 5 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ESNFor 1Against 21Abst. 1No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
No groupFor 12Against 11Abst. 5No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia100
Germany0140
Lithuania010
Poland021
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 7 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment239 for, 353 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 612 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 18 to paragraph 17 Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2024Amendment182 for, 362 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 519 voters
7 Jul 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 35 A coherent tax framework for the EU’s financial sectorAmendment279 for, 333 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 597 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 10 Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in IranAmendment193 for, 348 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 523 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 600 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 564 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 14 Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rightsAmendment239 for, 299 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.81 535 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 602 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 601 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.80 599 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180140
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 172, after paragraph 79 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 180140. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180140 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-180140,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 172, after paragraph 79 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180140}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/180140},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 180140. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}