Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 73, after paragraph 22

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections

Vote
Amendment 73, after paragraph 22
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 22 Oct 2025
Result
179 for · 439 against · 27 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 14:29
More facts (5)
Position
vote 44 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0192/2025 – Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec – After § 22 – Am 73
Text
Report A-10-2025-0192
Vote id
179994
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 179 for, 439 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 2Abst. 3No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
GreensFor 37Against 5Abst. 6No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
S&DFor 95Against 13Abst. 8No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 0No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 171Abst. 0No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 67Abst. 1No vote 11 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 78Abst. 1No vote 6 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 11Against 9Abst. 8No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium200
Czechia010
Germany1021
Denmark300
Spain400
Finland200
France400
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania001
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Netherlands411
Sweden003
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 74

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 74 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 588 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 589 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 588 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 587 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 Public procurementAmendment224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 590 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 423 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 595 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 21 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 300 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 435 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 615 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 17 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesAmendment160 for, 296 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 432 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 536 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179994
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 73, after paragraph 22 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 179994. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179994 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-179994,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 73, after paragraph 22 — General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sections}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179994}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179994},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179994. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}