Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2 — part 1, after paragraph 16

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council

Vote
Amendment 2 — part 1, after paragraph 16
Result
459 for · 161 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 14:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 11 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0167/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – After § 16 – Am 2/1
Vote id
179945
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 459 for, 161 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘regrets that such a course was necessary due to persistent vetoes; calls for the development of alternative mechanisms to bypass vetoes in urgent matters, pending treaty changes to improve decision-making efficiency and unity within the European Council;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 2Abst. 4No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 118Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 71Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 173Against 2Abst. 0No vote 13 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 14Against 51Abst. 1No vote 13 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
PatriotsFor 1Against 62Abst. 17No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.66
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 1Against 21Abst. 5No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium300
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Czechia300
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
France130
Greece010
Croatia010
Italy1170
Lithuania110
Latvia200
Netherlands100
Poland0170
Romania131
Sweden120

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 648 members

No vote recorded, 71

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 71 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment452 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 594 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 88 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote447 for, 199 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.91 590 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote453 for, 178 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.91 589 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 19 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote445 for, 188 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.90 595 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.90 571 voters
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseFinal347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.90 492 voters
19 Jun 2025Paragraph 33 — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 169 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.90 527 voters
17 Jul 2024Separate vote on recital E The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineSeparate vote482 for, 165 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.90 600 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote456 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.90 594 voters
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Final416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.90 564 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 2 — part 1, after paragraph 16 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 179945, reference 2024/2021(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179945 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-179945,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 — part 1, after paragraph 16 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179945}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179945},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179945, reference 2024/2021(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}