Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 17 — part 2

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council

Vote
Paragraph 17 — part 2
Result
445 for · 178 against · 17 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 14:58
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 11 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0167/2025 – Joachim Stanisław Brudziński – § 17/2
Vote id
179933
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 445 for, 178 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘deplores the Hungarian government’s misconduct of the Presidency of the Council in pursuing bilateral activities that contradict the Union’s fundamental values; strongly urges the Council to condemn such conduct.’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 4Abst. 2No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.77
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 115Against 1Abst. 0No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 71Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 165Against 2Abst. 2No vote 19 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 11Against 50Abst. 5No vote 13 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.64
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 1No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 1No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 1Against 21Abst. 6No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1200
Denmark210
Estonia200
Spain1800
Finland200
France1200
Greece300
Croatia200
Ireland100
Italy1600
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland200
Portugal600
Romania800
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseFinal347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.92 484 voters
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 2 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote435 for, 190 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 575 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 19 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote445 for, 188 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote453 for, 178 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.92 588 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeFinal452 for, 176 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.92 587 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructureAmendment426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriots, Renewr · shared0.92 569 voters
17 Jul 2024Separate vote on recital E The need for the EU's continuous support for UkraineSeparate vote482 for, 165 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.92 592 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.92 579 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 Systematic repression of human rights in Iran, notably the cases of Pakhshan Azizi and Wrisha Moradi, and the taking of EU citizens as hostagesSplit vote437 for, 158 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 541 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote456 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 587 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 17 — part 2 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 179933, reference 2024/2021(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179933 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-179933,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 17 — part 2 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179933}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179933},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179933, reference 2024/2021(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}