Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 9 — part 2

Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections

Vote
Paragraph 9 — part 2
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 22 Oct 2025
Result
450 for · 153 against · 14 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 October 2025, 15:08
More facts (6)
Position
vote 6 of 18 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: The Left
Official label
RC-B10-0451/2025 – § 9/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0454
Dossier
2025/2900(RSP)
Vote id
179916
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 450 for, 153 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 73 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 3Against 36Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 39Against 9Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 6No vote 20 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 68Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 165Against 1Abst. 1No vote 21 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 57Against 5Abst. 1No vote 16 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 6Against 60Abst. 1No vote 18 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
ESNFor 0Against 19Abst. 3No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 2Against 22Abst. 2No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria100
Belgium110
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain040
Finland200
France130
Croatia100
Italy300
Lithuania100
Luxembourg010
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 617 members

No vote recorded, 102

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 102 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on UkraineFinal418 for, 135 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.90 523 voters
9 Oct 2024Paragraph 22 — part 2 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaSplit vote487 for, 113 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by EPP, ESNr · shared0.89 553 voters
9 Oct 2024Separate vote on paragraph 9 The democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in GeorgiaSeparate vote490 for, 114 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 568 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on GeorgiaFinal490 for, 147 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.88 593 voters
13 Feb 2025Paragraph 4 — part 1 Further deterioration of the political situation in GeorgiaSplit vote390 for, 98 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 474 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 252 — part 6 Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation AgreementSplit vote424 for, 152 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 515 voters
8 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Security of energy supply in the EUFinal459 for, 170 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.87 572 voters
28 Nov 2024Final vote — text as a whole Reinforcing EU’s unwavering support to Ukraine against Russia’s war of aggression and the increasing military cooperation between North Korea and RussiaFinal390 for, 135 against, 52 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.87 498 voters
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on paragraph 11 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesSeparate vote448 for, 129 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.87 537 voters
16 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureFinal470 for, 129 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.86 569 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 4 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179916
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 9 — part 2 — Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections”. Vote, 22 October 2025. votingId 179916, reference 2025/2900(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179916 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-22-179916,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 9 — part 2 — Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179916}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-22/179916},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179916, reference 2025/2900(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}