Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Proposal to reject the text

Monitoring framework for resilient European forests

Vote
Proposal to reject the text
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 21 Oct 2025
Result
370 for · 264 against · 9 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
21 October 2025, 13:25
More facts (6)
Effect
Rejected outright — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 11 on the decision
Official label
A10-0176/2025 – Emma Wiesner, Eric Sargiacomo – Proposal for rejection
Text
Report A-10-2025-0176
Dossier
2023/0413(COD)
Vote id
179804
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 370 for, 264 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 58 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected outright.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 37Abst. 0No vote 9 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 2Against 117Abst. 0No vote 17 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 20Against 46Abst. 5No vote 4 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.47
EPPFor 164Against 5Abst. 2No vote 17 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 15Against 10Abst. 1No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia700
Denmark100
Spain500
France2800
Greece100
Hungary1100
Italy400
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 582 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 304 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment360 for, 282 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.93 588 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 62 + 123 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment394 for, 259 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 606 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.93 580 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.93 584 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 240 + 300 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 276 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.93 584 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 232 + 291 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment366 for, 273 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.93 586 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 586 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 583 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 222 + 280 (voted as one) to recital 7 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 274 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.92 583 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-21/179804
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Proposal to reject the text — Monitoring framework for resilient European forests”. Vote, 21 October 2025. votingId 179804, reference 2023/0413(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-21/179804 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-21-179804,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Proposal to reject the text — Monitoring framework for resilient European forests}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-21/179804}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-21/179804},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179804, reference 2023/0413(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}