Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 22 to article 1

Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group

Vote
Amendment 22 to article 1
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 21 Oct 2025
Result
236 for · 395 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 October 2025, 13:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 12 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0175/2025 – Emma Wiesner, Pekka Toveri – Article 1 – § 1 – point 3; Council Decision 89/367/EEC – Article 2 – paragraph 2 – after point d – Am 22
Text
Report A-10-2025-0175
Dossier
2023/0410(COD)
Vote id
179797
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 236 for, 395 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 37 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 1No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 108Against 8Abst. 1No vote 19 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 10Against 60Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.79
EPPFor 11Against 159Abst. 1No vote 17 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 0Against 68Abst. 0No vote 11 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 15Against 7Abst. 2No vote 3 of 27Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
No groupFor 6Against 16Abst. 4No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium030
Bulgaria010
Czechia030
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
France040
Greece010
Croatia010
Italy0190
Lithuania020
Latvia030
Netherlands010
Poland0180
Romania050
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 640 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 May 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 2 Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023Amendment192 for, 374 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 523 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 196 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment202 for, 428 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 582 voters
17 Dec 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectivesFinal230 for, 402 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Left, Greensr · shared0.85 592 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 219 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment201 for, 426 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 576 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 217 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 423 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 576 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 1 to paragraph 4 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAmendment237 for, 361 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 599 voters
21 May 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 36 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardAmendment205 for, 344 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 510 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 194 + 273 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment210 for, 421 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, The Leftr · shared0.84 586 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 33, adding text after recital 28 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment232 for, 389 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 599 voters
8 Jul 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 EU-Greenland and Denmark Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement: Implementing Protocol 2025-2030 (Resolution)Amendment237 for, 436 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 611 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 8 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-21/179797
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 22 to article 1 — Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group”. Vote, 21 October 2025. votingId 179797, reference 2023/0410(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-21/179797 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-21-179797,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 22 to article 1 — Standing Forest and Forestry Expert Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-21/179797}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-21/179797},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179797, reference 2023/0410(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}