Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital D — part 2

Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in Cabaret

Vote
Recital D — part 2
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 9 Oct 2025
Result
434 for · 161 against · 12 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:11
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 13 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
RC-B10-0411/2025 – Recital D/2
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0430
Dossier
2025/2905(RSP)
Vote id
179774
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 434 for, 161 against, 12 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas USAID cuts have suspended vital humanitarian services and threaten support for UN missions;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 102Against 0Abst. 0No vote 34 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 169Against 2Abst. 1No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 6Against 62Abst. 1No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
PatriotsFor 0Against 66Abst. 0No vote 19 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 9No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia100
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland020
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.96 524 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.96 526 voters
7 Jul 2026Paragraph 43 — part 2 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learningSplit vote464 for, 177 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.96 543 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 525 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 567 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 561 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital O — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote426 for, 151 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 526 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 539 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 520 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.94 561 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 2 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179774
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Recital D — part 2 — Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in Cabaret”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179774, reference 2025/2905(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179774 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179774,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital D — part 2 — Humanitarian and security situation in Haiti, in particular the rising power of criminal gangs and the recent massacre in Cabaret}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179774}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179774},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179774, reference 2025/2905(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}