Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Motion of censure on the Commission

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Result
133 for · 383 against · 78 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
9 October 2025, 13:10
More facts (6)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
B10-0402/2025 – Motion for a resolution
Vote id
179571
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 133 for, 383 against, 78 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 22 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 13Against 31Abst. 2No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
S&DFor 2Against 90Abst. 6No vote 38 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 4Against 55Abst. 1No vote 15 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 0Against 168Abst. 0No vote 20 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 22Against 34Abst. 11No vote 12 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
PatriotsFor 7Against 2Abst. 56No vote 20 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.79
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 23Against 3Abst. 2No vote 2 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium200
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark100
Spain200
Finland300
France800
Greece400
Ireland300
Italy900
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 594 members

No vote recorded, 125

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 125 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal175 for, 360 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 32 %r · shared0.87 470 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 5 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment77 for, 455 against, 121 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 544 voters
22 Jan 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion of censure on the CommissionFinal165 for, 390 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.80 481 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Jan 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 12 Brutal repression against protesters in IranAmendment72 for, 461 against, 91 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 522 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment172 for, 428 against, 76 abstained Rejected For 25 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 557 voters
27 Nov 2025Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for UkraineAmendment110 for, 375 against, 82 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 483 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 91, adding text after paragraph 40 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment95 for, 495 against, 60 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 541 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 7 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment166 for, 430 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 519 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 2, adding text after Recital P Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Amendment115 for, 427 against, 116 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 548 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 10, adding text after recital H Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment167 for, 434 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 27 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 520 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Motion of censure on the Commission”. Vote, 9 October 2025. votingId 179571, reference 2025/2173(INS). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179571 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-09-179571,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Motion of censure on the Commission}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179571}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-09/179571},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179571, reference 2025/2173(INS). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}