Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 146 to recital 15

Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain

Vote
Amendment 146 to recital 15
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 8 Oct 2025
Result
263 for · 299 against · 71 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 October 2025, 13:51
More facts (6)
Position
vote 39 of 45 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens
Official label
A10-0161/2025 – Céline Imart – Recital 15 – Am 146
Text
Report A-10-2025-0161
Dossier
2024/0319(COD)
Vote id
179531
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 263 for, 299 against, 71 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 42 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 35Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 3Abst. 0No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 17Against 50Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.62
EPPFor 1Against 169Abst. 2No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 3Against 52Abst. 17No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
PatriotsFor 35Against 0Abst. 43No vote 7 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
ESNFor 2Against 18Abst. 4No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.63
No groupFor 19Against 6Abst. 5No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1400
Denmark300
Spain300
Finland100
France200
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 633 members

No vote recorded, 86

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 86 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 78 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Amendment253 for, 361 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 589 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 586 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 Public procurementAmendment280 for, 338 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.82 584 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment231 for, 326 against, 58 abstained Rejected For 38 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 539 voters
22 Jan 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital A Presidential elections in Honduras, the non-recognition of the outcome by the incumbent administration and the attacks on opposition members of the National AssemblyAmendment215 for, 362 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 552 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 16 to paragraph 92 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment255 for, 314 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 572 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 Public procurementAmendment250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 588 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment219 for, 357 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.81 541 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 Public procurementAmendment254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.81 586 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 4 to paragraph 6 The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment241 for, 345 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.80 541 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179531
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 146 to recital 15 — Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain”. Vote, 8 October 2025. votingId 179531, reference 2024/0319(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179531 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-08-179531,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 146 to recital 15 — Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179531}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179531},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179531, reference 2024/0319(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}