Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 124 to article 1

Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain

Vote
Amendment 124 to article 1
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 8 Oct 2025
Result
208 for · 382 against · 53 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 October 2025, 13:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 45 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
A10-0161/2025 – Céline Imart – Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2; Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; Article 148 – paragraph 5 – point a – Am 124
Text
Report A-10-2025-0161
Dossier
2024/0319(COD)
Vote id
179518
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 208 for, 382 against, 53 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 32 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 6Against 29Abst. 0No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.74
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 8Against 106Abst. 1No vote 21 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
RenewFor 66Against 1Abst. 2No vote 6 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 51Against 118Abst. 3No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.53
ECRFor 18Against 49Abst. 5No vote 7 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
PatriotsFor 1Against 50Abst. 27No vote 7 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 3No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 10Against 8Abst. 12No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Cyprus100
Czechia002
Germany810
Spain001
France010
Greece031
Luxembourg001
Poland001
Romania011
Slovakia105

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 9 to recital C Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment143 for, 452 against, 55 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.57 580 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179518
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 124 to article 1 — Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain”. Vote, 8 October 2025. votingId 179518, reference 2024/0319(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179518 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-08-179518,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 124 to article 1 — Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179518}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179518},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179518, reference 2024/0319(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}