Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 8 — part 2

Draft amending budget No 2/2025: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure

Vote
Paragraph 8 — part 2
Result
406 for · 181 against · 44 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 October 2025, 13:59
More facts (6)
Position
vote 8 of 12 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0165/2025 – Victor Negrescu – § 8/2
Vote id
179505
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 406 for, 181 against, 44 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘regrets that the current budgetary situation has led the Commission to redeploy significant funds across Headings and recalls its long-standing position that new policy priorities, tasks or needs should be accompanied by fresh money; stresses strongly that recurrent redeployments are not a viable way to finance the Union’s priorities as they damage investments and jeopardise the delivery of agreed policy objectives;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 3Abst. 1No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 7Abst. 0No vote 22 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
RenewFor 57Against 12Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
EPPFor 158Against 10Abst. 0No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 2Against 66Abst. 1No vote 10 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 0Against 52Abst. 25No vote 8 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.51
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 1No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 6Against 8Abst. 16No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium021
Czechia008
Denmark001
Spain060
France0250
Greece001
Hungary0011
Italy060
Latvia001
Netherlands050
Poland020
Portugal002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 631 members

No vote recorded, 88

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 88 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 May 2026Paragraph 18 — part 2 The need to reduce work-related fatalitiesSplit vote303 for, 165 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by The Left, Patriotsr · shared0.91 417 voters
18 Jun 2025Recital E — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote420 for, 224 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.89 581 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 19 — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote430 for, 218 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.87 580 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
30 Apr 2026Paragraph 6 — part 2 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in HaitiSplit vote370 for, 180 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 500 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Separate vote425 for, 181 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 579 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 19 — part 3 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote404 for, 235 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.86 575 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 115 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Separate vote381 for, 242 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 573 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 92 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumAmendment465 for, 176 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 608 voters
18 Jun 2025Recital G — part 2 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilitySplit vote418 for, 200 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 64 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.86 578 voters
11 Mar 2026Paragraph 32 — part 3 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Split vote383 for, 220 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.85 559 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 8 — part 2 — Draft amending budget No 2/2025: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure”. Vote, 8 October 2025. votingId 179505, reference 2025/0206(BUD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179505 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 October 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-10-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-10-08-179505,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 8 — part 2 — Draft amending budget No 2/2025: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditure}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-10-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179505}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-10-08/179505},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179505, reference 2025/0206(BUD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-10-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-10-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}