Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the whole text

Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution

Vote
Final vote on the whole text
Result
305 for · 151 against · 122 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 September 2025, 13:39
More facts (7)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 59 of 65 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
RC-B10-0372/2025 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
Vote id
179048
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 305 for, 151 against, 122 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 53 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 14Against 9Abst. 5No vote 18 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
GreensFor 38Against 1Abst. 4No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
S&DFor 104Against 2Abst. 4No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 53Against 1Abst. 8No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
EPPFor 82Against 56Abst. 6No vote 44 of 188Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
ECRFor 0Against 22Abst. 43No vote 14 of 79Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.49
PatriotsFor 0Against 42Abst. 33No vote 10 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ESNFor 2Against 15Abst. 8No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
No groupFor 12Against 3Abst. 11No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria111
Czechia001
Germany0131
France010
Hungary001
Lithuania100
Poland002
Slovakia002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 578 members

No vote recorded, 141

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 141 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Gender Equality Strategy 2025Final310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.71 497 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 4 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote353 for, 224 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.71 518 voters
16 Sept 2026Recital B — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote395 for, 179 against, 63 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.70 510 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 16 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote330 for, 256 against, 57 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.68 522 voters
16 Sept 2026Recital J — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.68 513 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote359 for, 218 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.67 520 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 3 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote406 for, 200 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.67 514 voters
11 Mar 2026Separate vote on paragraph 53 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsSeparate vote379 for, 180 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.66 502 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 53 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote248 for, 158 against, 114 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.66 427 voters
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsSplit vote334 for, 270 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.66 517 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the whole text — Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution”. Vote, 11 September 2025. votingId 179048, reference 2025/2852(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/179048 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-11-179048,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the whole text — Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/179048}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/179048},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179048, reference 2025/2852(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}