Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 10 to paragraph 15

Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution

Vote
Amendment 10 to paragraph 15
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 11 Sept 2025
Result
301 for · 249 against · 32 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
11 September 2025, 13:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 36 of 65 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
RC-B10-0372/2025 - § 15 - Am 10
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0381
Dossier
2025/2852(RSP)
Vote id
179023
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 301 for, 249 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 52 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 29Abst. 1No vote 16 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
GreensFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 11 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 6Against 102Abst. 2No vote 26 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 8Against 46Abst. 4No vote 17 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
EPPFor 155Against 3Abst. 1No vote 29 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 62Against 2Abst. 0No vote 15 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
PatriotsFor 38Against 10Abst. 19No vote 18 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.35
ESNFor 22Against 2Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 10Against 13Abst. 4No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium030
Bulgaria400
Cyprus200
Czechia401
Germany2600
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland400
France300
Greece600
Croatia400
Ireland400
Italy900
Lithuania300
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2000
Portugal600
Romania900
Sweden500
Slovenia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 582 members

No vote recorded, 137

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 137 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Amendments 62 + 123 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment394 for, 259 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 547 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 232 + 291 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment366 for, 273 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.86 529 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.85 528 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.85 530 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.85 525 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.85 531 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 235 + 294 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.85 530 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 236 + 295 + 296 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 276 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.85 530 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 223 + 281 (voted as one) to recital 9 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 270 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.85 528 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 241 + 301 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 273 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.85 527 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/179023
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 — Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution”. Vote, 11 September 2025. votingId 179023, reference 2025/2852(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/179023 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-11-179023,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 10 to paragraph 15 — Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/179023}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/179023},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 179023, reference 2025/2852(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}