Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 27, after paragraph 1

Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution

Vote
Amendment 27, after paragraph 1
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 11 Sept 2025
Result
171 for · 378 against · 34 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
11 September 2025, 13:24
More facts (5)
Position
vote 2 of 65 on the decision
Official label
RC-B10-0372/2025 - Après le § 1 - Am 27
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0381
Dossier
2025/2852(RSP)
Vote id
178989
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 171 for, 378 against, 34 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 28Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 23Against 7Abst. 12No vote 11 of 53Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
S&DFor 78Against 20Abst. 3No vote 35 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.66
RenewFor 4Against 52Abst. 6No vote 13 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
EPPFor 14Against 141Abst. 5No vote 28 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ECRFor 0Against 65Abst. 0No vote 14 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 6Against 15Abst. 3No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
No groupFor 18Against 4Abst. 5No vote 3 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria030
Belgium400
Bulgaria001
Germany170
Denmark030
Estonia200
Spain1720
Finland200
France500
Greece300
Croatia400
Ireland100
Italy1402
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Malta300
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal700
Romania040
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 583 members

No vote recorded, 136

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 136 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 54 to paragraph 1, point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment199 for, 399 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 513 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 3 to recital T Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAmendment197 for, 403 against, 28 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 519 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 55 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment206 for, 391 against, 21 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 510 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 88 to paragraph 69 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment207 for, 445 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 548 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 4 to paragraph 1, after point k Recommendation on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peaceAmendment220 for, 389 against, 27 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 526 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 57 to paragraph 1, after point ab Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment200 for, 388 against, 41 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 515 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 48, adding text after paragraph 41 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment239 for, 409 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 554 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 29 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024Amendment196 for, 420 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 549 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 41, adding text after recital P Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment225 for, 396 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 523 voters
25 Nov 2024Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther156 for, 277 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 35 %r · shared0.82 361 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178989
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 27, after paragraph 1 — Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution”. Vote, 11 September 2025. votingId 178989, reference 2025/2852(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178989 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 11 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-11/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-11-178989,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 27, after paragraph 1 — Gaza at breaking point: EU action to combat famine and the urgent need to release hostages and move towards a two-state solution}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-11},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178989}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-11/178989},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178989, reference 2025/2852(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-11-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-11 (CC BY 4.0)}
}