Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Possibilities for simplification of cohesion funds

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Result
513 for · 111 against · 40 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
10 September 2025, 14:26
More facts (6)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
A10-0138/2025 - Vladimir Prebilič - Proposition de résolution
Vote id
178400
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 513 for, 111 against, 40 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 77 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 10Against 21Abst. 4No vote 11 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 168Against 6Abst. 1No vote 13 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 43Against 24Abst. 6No vote 6 of 79Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.38
PatriotsFor 8Against 52Abst. 21No vote 4 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
ESNFor 20Against 2Abst. 4No vote 1 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.65
No groupFor 21Against 5Abst. 4No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium400
Bulgaria300
Germany800
Denmark300
Estonia100
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland500
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden210
Slovenia200
Slovakia500

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 664 members

No vote recorded, 55

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 55 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Joint text Final vote 2026 budgetary procedure: joint textOther419 for, 185 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.73 614 voters
8 May 2025Final vote on the motion for a resolution Ninth report on economic and social cohesionFinal392 for, 125 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.72 536 voters
19 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole Clean Industrial DealFinal381 for, 173 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by EPP, Patriotsr · shared0.70 532 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European UnionFinal526 for, 79 against, 47 abstained Adopted For 81 %r · shared0.70 600 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 12 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.69 546 voters
27 Nov 2025Paragraph 24 — part 3 EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024Split vote487 for, 75 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 80 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.69 569 voters
16 Dec 2025Final vote Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural productsFinal431 for, 161 against, 70 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.69 615 voters
12 Mar 2025Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2025Final469 for, 162 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.69 631 voters
27 Nov 2024Joint text Final vote 2025 budgetary procedure: Joint textOther418 for, 185 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.68 616 voters
18 Dec 2024Final vote — text as a whole Amendment of Annex VI – Powers and responsibilities of the standing committeesFinal448 for, 161 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.68 604 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Possibilities for simplification of cohesion funds”. Vote, 10 September 2025. votingId 178400, reference 2024/2106(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178400 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 10 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-10/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-10-178400,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Possibilities for simplification of cohesion funds}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-10},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178400}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-10/178400},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178400, reference 2024/2106(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-10-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-10 (CC BY 4.0)}
}