Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the draft Council decision

EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil

Vote
Final vote on the draft Council decision
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 9 Sept 2025
Result
606 for · 5 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 September 2025, 13:51
More facts (6)
Effect
Consent given — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
A10-0142/2025 - Nikola Bartůšek - Projet de décision du Conseil
Text
Report A-10-2025-0142
Dossier
2024/0321(NLE)
Vote id
178336
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 606 for, 5 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 96 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Consent given.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 22Against 3Abst. 10No vote 11 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 110Against 0Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 5No vote 10 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 81Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 24Against 2Abst. 3No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria100
Cyprus100
Germany1100
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain2000
Finland200
France100
Greece300
Croatia400
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy1600
Lithuania200
Latvia100
Malta300
Netherlands300
Poland300
Portugal600
Romania1100
Sweden400
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 630 members

No vote recorded, 89

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 89 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178336
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the draft Council decision — EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil”. Vote, 9 September 2025. votingId 178336, reference 2024/0321(NLE). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178336 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-09-09-178336,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the draft Council decision — EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178336}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-09-09/178336},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178336, reference 2024/0321(NLE). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}