Vote · Final vote

Request for urgent procedure

European Climate Law

Vote: Request for urgent procedure
Decision: No. 1 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2025
Result: 300 for · 379 against · 8 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date: 9 July 2025, 13:12

More facts (4)

Effect: Urgent procedure refused — this vote decided the decision
Position: vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label: C10-0137/2025 – Request for an urgent decision
Vote id: 178111

Effect: Urgent procedure refused — this vote decided the decision
Position: vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label: C10-0137/2025 – Request for an urgent decision
Vote id: 178111

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Rejected · 44 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Urgent procedure refused.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 42	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 51	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 128	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 7 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.99
Renew	For 65	Against 1	Abst. 5	No vote 4 of 75	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.87
EPP	For 4	Against 174	Abst. 0	No vote 10 of 188	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.97
ECR	For 0	Against 78	Abst. 0	No vote 1 of 79	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
Patriots	For 0	Against 82	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
ESN	For 0	Against 27	Abst. 0	No vote 0 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 10	Against 17	Abst. 2	No vote 1 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	0–2–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–5–0	0–3–0	0–8–0	0–1–0	0–2–0
Germany	4–0–0	14–0–0	13–0–0	1–1–5	1–30–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–15–0	8–1–0
Denmark	1–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	3–0–0	4–0–0	19–0–0	1–0–0	0–21–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	2–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	9–0–0	5–0–0	12–0–0	13–0–0	0–6–0	0–4–0	0–27–0	0–1–0	0–1–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	1–1–2
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	0–7–0	no member voted	0–11–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	5–0–0	1–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	9–0–0	4–0–0	21–0–0	no member voted	0–7–0	0–24–0	0–8–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–3–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	6–0–0	4–0–0	7–0–0	0–6–0	0–1–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	0–20–0	0–20–0	0–2–0	0–3–0	0–1–0
Portugal	1–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	2–0–0	0–6–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	7–0–1	3–0–0	0–10–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	0–5–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–5–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	6–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	0–5–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against
Austria	0	5
Belgium	0	2
Bulgaria	0	6
Cyprus	0	2
Czechia	0	5
Germany	1	30
Denmark	0	1
Estonia	0	2
Spain	0	21
Finland	2	2
France	0	6
Greece	0	7
Croatia	0	6
Hungary	0	7
Ireland	1	3
Italy	0	7
Lithuania	0	3
Luxembourg	0	2
Latvia	0	2
Malta	0	2
Netherlands	0	6
Poland	0	20
Portugal	0	6
Romania	0	10
Sweden	0	5
Slovenia	0	5
Slovakia	0	1

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 687 members

No vote recorded, 32

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 32 members

Name · group that day · country

Ana Miguel PEDRO group that day: EPP · Portugal
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Bartosz ARŁUKOWICZ group that day: EPP · Poland
Borys BUDKA group that day: EPP · Poland
Branislav ONDRUŠ group that day: No group · Slovakia
Delara BURKHARDT group that day: S&D · Germany
Dragoş BENEA group that day: S&D · Romania
Elena NEVADO DEL CAMPO group that day: EPP · Spain
Emma RAFOWICZ group that day: S&D · France
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Hana JALLOUL MURO group that day: S&D · Spain
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Joachim STREIT group that day: Renew · Germany
João OLIVEIRA group that day: The Left · Portugal
Katrin LANGENSIEPEN group that day: Greens · Germany
Krzysztof HETMAN group that day: EPP · Poland
Letizia MORATTI group that day: EPP · Italy
Marco FALCONE group that day: EPP · Italy
Maria OHISALO group that day: Greens · Finland
Matthieu VALET group that day: Patriots · France
Michael MCNAMARA group that day: Renew · Ireland
Michał KOBOSKO group that day: Renew · Poland
Mihai TUDOSE group that day: S&D · Romania
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Niels Flemming HANSEN group that day: EPP · Denmark
Nils UŠAKOVS group that day: S&D · Latvia
Ondřej KOVAŘÍK group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Pascal ARIMONT group that day: EPP · Belgium
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Roberts ZĪLE group that day: ECR · Latvia
Sigrid FRIIS group that day: Renew · Denmark
Thierry MARIANI group that day: Patriots · France

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.97 567 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.97 565 voters
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 112 — part 3 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report	Split vote	284 for, 335 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 45 %	Requested by EPP, S&D	r · shared0.97 591 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.97 560 voters
8 Oct 2025	Amendment 143 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chain	Amendment	282 for, 360 against, 3 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.97 624 voters
18 Jun 2025	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on Montenegro	Amendment	278 for, 349 against, 23 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.96 627 voters
29 Apr 2026	Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected	For 44 %	Requested by Greens, EPP	r · shared0.96 589 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.96 551 voters
20 May 2026	Amendment 10 to paragraph 1, point f Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly	Amendment	299 for, 336 against, 9 abstained Rejected	For 46 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.96 607 voters
17 Sept 2026	Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders	Amendment	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained Rejected	For 43 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.96 572 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Decision European Climate Law New EU law 9 Jul 2025 Urgent procedure refused

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178111
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Request for urgent procedure — European Climate Law”. Vote, 9 July 2025. votingId 178111. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178111 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-09-178111,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Request for urgent procedure — European Climate Law}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178111}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178111},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178111. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}