Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 42 — part 3

Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum

Vote
Paragraph 42 — part 3
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2025
Result
468 for · 180 against · 21 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 July 2025, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 19 of 30 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, S&D · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0125/2025 – Robert Biedroń, Nikolas Farantouris – § 42/3
Text
Report A-10-2025-0125
Dossier
2025/2014(INI)
Vote id
178091
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 468 for, 180 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘and SRHR human right defenders’ without the second ‘R’ in the acronym ‘SRHR’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 1Abst. 1No vote 15 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 157Against 9Abst. 4No vote 18 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
ECRFor 6Against 71Abst. 0No vote 2 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 5Against 67Abst. 8No vote 5 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ESNFor 0Against 26Abst. 0No vote 1 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 8No vote 1 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium200
Bulgaria500
Cyprus200
Czechia401
Germany3100
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain2100
Finland400
France510
Greece600
Croatia321
Ireland400
Italy511
Lithuania210
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland1901
Portugal600
Romania910
Sweden500
Slovenia320
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 669 members

No vote recorded, 50

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 50 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUFinal447 for, 160 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 69 %r · shared0.93 601 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital BB — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote439 for, 168 against, 16 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 581 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.92 570 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote414 for, 195 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 596 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 568 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 45 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote421 for, 181 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.91 587 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 565 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.91 568 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote421 for, 178 against, 33 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.91 605 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 61 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote416 for, 187 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 592 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178091
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 42 — part 3 — Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum”. Vote, 9 July 2025. votingId 178091, reference 2025/2014(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178091 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-09-178091,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 42 — part 3 — Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political Forum}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178091}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178091},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178091, reference 2025/2014(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}