Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote on the motion for a resolution

Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high risk

Vote
Final vote on the motion for a resolution
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2025
Result
373 for · 289 against · 26 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 July 2025, 13:18
More facts (7)
Effect
Objection passed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left, EPP, Greens
Official label
B10-0321/2025 – Motion for a resolution
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0321
Dossier
2025/2739(RSP)
Vote id
178008
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 373 for, 289 against, 26 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 54 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Objection passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 42Abst. 0No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 128Abst. 1No vote 7 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 12Against 59Abst. 3No vote 1 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.70
EPPFor 167Against 2Abst. 9No vote 10 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 77Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 81Against 1Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 4No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.76
No groupFor 15Against 6Abst. 9No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain030
Finland030
France090
Greece040
Ireland030
Italy090
Portugal010
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 688 members

No vote recorded, 31

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 31 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 225 + 283 (voted as one) to recital 14 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment365 for, 271 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 614 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 238 + 298 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 272 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 617 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 241 + 301 (voted as one) to Article 3 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 273 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.96 616 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendments 223 + 281 (voted as one) to recital 9 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 270 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 614 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 227 + 285 (voted as one) to recital 19 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 269 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 612 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 235 + 294 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.96 619 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 233 + 292 (voted as one) to Article 2 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment367 for, 274 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ESN, ECRr · shared0.96 618 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 248 + 310 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment361 for, 273 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.96 614 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 305 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment358 for, 277 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 614 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 224 + 282 (voted as one) to recital 12 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment364 for, 266 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&D, ECRr · shared0.96 608 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178008
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high risk”. Vote, 9 July 2025. votingId 178008, reference 2025/2739(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178008 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-09-178008,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote on the motion for a resolution — Deforestation Regulation - list of countries presenting a low or high risk}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178008}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/178008},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 178008, reference 2025/2739(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}