Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 38 — part 2

Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports

Vote
Paragraph 38 — part 2
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 9 Jul 2025
Result
480 for · 196 against · 3 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
9 July 2025, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 9 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members · split vote: Members
Official label
A10-0133/2025 – Salvatore De Meo – § 38/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0133
Dossier
2025/2037(INI)
Vote id
177975
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 480 for, 196 against, 3 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 71 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “stresses the importance of granting the Commission direct powers to investigate and sanction certain high impact breaches of consumer law, thus ensuring more effective, simultaneous and uniform enforcement and sanctions under EU consumer law;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 1Abst. 2No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 127Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 174Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 74Abst. 0No vote 4 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 2Against 80Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ESNFor 2Against 24Abst. 1No vote 0 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
No groupFor 13Against 17Abst. 0No vote 0 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria500
Belgium400
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Germany1200
Denmark300
Estonia200
Spain1900
Finland200
France1200
Greece300
Croatia400
Hungary200
Ireland100
Italy2000
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Malta300
Netherlands400
Poland300
Portugal800
Romania800
Sweden500
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 679 members

No vote recorded, 40

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 40 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.96 619 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 540 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.96 550 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Paragraph 18 — part 2 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote459 for, 171 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.95 625 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 2 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote405 for, 166 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 556 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeSplit vote456 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 628 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 59 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 619 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 571 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 612 voters
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 589 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 6 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/177975
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 38 — part 2 — Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports”. Vote, 9 July 2025. votingId 177975, reference 2025/2037(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/177975 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 July 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-07-09/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-07-09-177975,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 38 — part 2 — Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-07-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/177975}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-07-09/177975},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177975, reference 2025/2037(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-07-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-07-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}