Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 278 to recital 24

Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability

Vote
Amendment 278 to recital 24
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 19 Jun 2025
Result
326 for · 232 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
19 June 2025, 13:19
More facts (6)
Position
vote 74 of 78 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew
Official label
A10-0104/2025 – Veronika Vrecionová – Recital 24 – Am 278
Text
Report A-10-2025-0104
Dossier
2023/0447(COD)
Vote id
177505
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 326 for, 232 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 34Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 1Abst. 5No vote 23 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 56Against 4Abst. 0No vote 15 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.90
EPPFor 11Against 129Abst. 1No vote 47 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.87
ECRFor 20Against 33Abst. 10No vote 16 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.29
PatriotsFor 32Against 37Abst. 3No vote 13 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.27
ESNFor 1Against 23Abst. 1No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 14Against 5Abst. 4No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia001
Germany0140
France100
Hungary010
Poland030
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 582 members

No vote recorded, 137

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 137 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point h — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote286 for, 237 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 476 voters
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4 Joint communication on humanitarian aidAmendment279 for, 259 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.82 491 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 1, point ad Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment308 for, 313 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 522 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 29, adding text after recital F Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment291 for, 303 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 523 voters
15 Jun 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the S&D Group — AI Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AIOther244 for, 179 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 56 %r · shared0.80 357 voters
8 Oct 2025Amendment 148 to Article 1 Strengthening of the position of farmers in the food supply chainAmendment305 for, 325 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.79 526 voters
12 Feb 2026Amendment 10, adding text after recital AG Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategyAmendment265 for, 273 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.79 486 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 60 2023 and 2024 reports on MontenegroAmendment276 for, 307 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 559 voters
23 Oct 2024Amendment 19 to paragraph 90, After point d General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sectionsAmendment291 for, 322 against, 39 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.79 530 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 44 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote280 for, 322 against, 62 abstained Rejected For 42 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.79 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177505
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 278 to recital 24 — Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability”. Vote, 19 June 2025. votingId 177505, reference 2023/0447(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177505 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 19 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-19/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-19-177505,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 278 to recital 24 — Welfare of dogs and cats and their traceability}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-19},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177505}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-19/177505},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177505, reference 2023/0447(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-19-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-19 (CC BY 4.0)}
}