Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group
Decision
No. 1 of the sitting of 16 Jun 2025
Result
65 for · 338 against · 24 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
16 June 2025, 18:28
More facts (4)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group
Vote id
177126
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 65 for, 338 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 15 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 31Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 17Against 7Abst. 10No vote 19 of 53Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
S&DFor 3Against 66Abst. 6No vote 61 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
RenewFor 1Against 37Abst. 4No vote 33 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 0Against 118Abst. 0No vote 70 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 38 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 0Against 54Abst. 1No vote 30 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ESNFor 0Against 11Abst. 2No vote 14 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 13Against 4Abst. 1No vote 12 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Bulgaria010
Cyprus010
Finland010
France010
Greece010
Italy0120
Latvia020
Netherlands010
Poland0120
Romania040
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 427 members

No vote recorded, 292

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 292 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment99 for, 538 against, 34 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 406 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 5 Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in HaitiAmendment84 for, 464 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 336 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of AmericaAmendment65 for, 526 against, 48 abstained Rejected For 10 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 383 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina FasoAmendment99 for, 407 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.83 337 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 374 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment99 for, 547 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 389 voters
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.82 315 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 391 voters
18 Dec 2024Amendment 9 to recital D Setting up a Special Committee on the Housing Crisis in the European Union, and defining its responsibilities, numerical strength and term of officeAmendment77 for, 520 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 12 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 391 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 38 EU–Mexico Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement (Interim report)Amendment100 for, 551 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.82 397 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-16/177126
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group”. Vote, 16 June 2025. votingId 177126. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-16/177126 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-16-177126,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-16/177126}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-16/177126},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177126. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}