Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D and Renew groups

Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D and Renew groups

Vote
Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D and Renew groups
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 16 Jun 2025
Result
300 for · 66 against · 77 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 June 2025, 18:28
More facts (4)
Effect
Adopted — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D and Renew groups
Vote id
177125
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 300 for, 66 against, 77 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 68 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Adopted.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 3Abst. 27No vote 15 of 46Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.81
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 81Against 0Abst. 0No vote 55 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 42Against 0Abst. 0No vote 33 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 114Against 0Abst. 2No vote 72 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 0Against 39Abst. 5No vote 35 of 79Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
PatriotsFor 3Against 22Abst. 30No vote 30 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
ESNFor 1Against 1Abst. 11No vote 14 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.77
No groupFor 13Against 1Abst. 2No vote 14 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Bulgaria400
Cyprus200
Czechia500
Germany2300
Denmark200
Spain900
Finland100
France300
Greece500
Croatia400
Hungary300
Ireland400
Italy300
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Malta200
Netherlands500
Poland1700
Portugal600
Romania300
Sweden200
Slovenia202
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 443 members

No vote recorded, 276

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 276 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 102 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment414 for, 215 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 408 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.85 358 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 97 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment413 for, 220 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 407 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 363 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.85 361 voters
8 May 2025Final vote Screening of foreign investments in the UnionFinal378 for, 173 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.84 361 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote420 for, 222 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 424 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsFinal412 for, 245 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.82 416 voters
26 Nov 2025Paragraph 25 — part 2 Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and materialSplit vote467 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %r · shared0.82 420 voters
20 Jan 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member StatesSplit vote419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.82 408 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-16/177125
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S&D and Renew groups — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D and Renew groups”. Vote, 16 June 2025. votingId 177125. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-16/177125 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 June 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-06-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-06-16-177125,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PPE, S\&D and Renew groups — Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S\&D and Renew groups}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-16/177125}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-06-16/177125},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 177125. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-06-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-06-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}