Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 29, after recital F

Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023

Vote
Amendment 29, after recital F
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 22 May 2025
Result
294 for · 261 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
22 May 2025, 12:38
More facts (6)
Position
vote 56 of 58 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
A10-0063/2025 - Gheorghe Falcă - Après le considérant F - Am 29
Text
Report A-10-2025-0063
Dossier
2025/2027(INI)
Vote id
176938
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 294 for, 261 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 28Abst. 10No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
GreensFor 36Against 8Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.73
S&DFor 6Against 101Abst. 0No vote 29 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 0Against 62Abst. 1No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 149Against 2Abst. 2No vote 35 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 57Against 9Abst. 3No vote 11 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
PatriotsFor 32Against 33Abst. 0No vote 20 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.26
ESNFor 4Against 15Abst. 3No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.52
No groupFor 10Against 3Abst. 9No vote 7 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria020
Czechia100
Germany0111
Hungary001
Lithuania001
Poland300
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 583 members

No vote recorded, 136

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 136 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 6 to recital J The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeAmendment343 for, 230 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.76 500 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point x — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote246 for, 295 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.73 461 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 107, adding text after paragraph 17 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment314 for, 322 against, 32 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.71 542 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2025Amendment 103 to paragraph 46 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment316 for, 281 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.71 528 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 Addressing transnational repression of human rights defendersAmendment315 for, 202 against, 119 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.71 529 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment258 for, 323 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.70 545 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 25 to citation 2 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment238 for, 303 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.70 511 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendments 67 + 70 (voted as one) to Article 20 Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast)Amendment289 for, 316 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.68 527 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 2 to paragraph 47 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment259 for, 325 against, 77 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.67 543 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 119, adding text after paragraph 24 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment310 for, 341 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.67 548 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176938
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 29, after recital F — Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023”. Vote, 22 May 2025. votingId 176938, reference 2025/2027(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176938 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-22-176938,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 29, after recital F — Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176938}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176938},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176938, reference 2025/2027(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}