Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 28 — part 3, after paragraph 19

Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023

Vote
Amendment 28 — part 3, after paragraph 19
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 22 May 2025
Result
192 for · 374 against · 11 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 May 2025, 12:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 58 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, ESN · split vote: ESN
Official label
A10-0063/2025 - Gheorghe Falcă - Après le § 19 - Am 28/3
Text
Report A-10-2025-0063
Dossier
2025/2027(INI)
Vote id
176921
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 192 for, 374 against, 11 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “takes note of the court cases filed in 2023 against the President of the Commission for the alleged “destruction of public documents”; further notes that on 14 May 2025, the EU General Court ruled that the Commission was wrong to refuse access to these text messages, emphasising that such communications fall under EU transparency rules and should have been disclosed;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 23Abst. 7No vote 14 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.58
GreensFor 1Against 43Abst. 0No vote 9 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 0Against 105Abst. 1No vote 30 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 1Against 62Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 9Against 138Abst. 1No vote 40 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 67Against 0Abst. 2No vote 11 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 3Abst. 0No vote 9 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia600
Denmark100
Spain500
France2700
Hungary800
Italy600
Latvia100
Netherlands300
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 577 members

No vote recorded, 142

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 142 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment203 for, 417 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 531 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 84 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 10; Directive (UE) 2015/2302; Article 18, paragraph 2 Package travel and linked travel arrangements: make the protection of travellers more effective and simplify and clarify certain aspectsAmendment195 for, 411 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 507 voters
10 Mar 2025Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR GroupOther110 for, 309 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.96 342 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Jul 2025Amendment 1 to recital 2 Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesAmendment191 for, 452 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 531 voters
20 Jan 2025Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PfE Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther108 for, 313 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 25 %r · shared0.96 348 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 17 to paragraph 1, after point o Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment205 for, 437 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 523 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 488 voters
10 Jul 2025Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitivenessAmendment193 for, 443 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.95 529 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 496 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 421 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 488 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176921
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 28 — part 3, after paragraph 19 — Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023”. Vote, 22 May 2025. votingId 176921, reference 2025/2027(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176921 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-22-176921,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 28 — part 3, after paragraph 19 — Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176921}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176921},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176921, reference 2025/2027(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}