Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Separate vote: paragraph 2

Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023

Vote
Separate vote: paragraph 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 22 May 2025
Result
266 for · 304 against · 22 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
22 May 2025, 12:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 3 of 58 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP
Official label
A10-0063/2025 - Gheorghe Falcă - § 2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0063
Dossier
2025/2027(INI)
Vote id
176903
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 266 for, 304 against, 22 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 45 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 105Against 0Abst. 2No vote 29 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 57Against 7Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
EPPFor 5Against 150Abst. 0No vote 33 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
ECRFor 1Against 67Abst. 0No vote 12 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 55Abst. 15No vote 15 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.68
ESNFor 3Against 22Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 12Against 3Abst. 5No vote 9 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium500
Bulgaria200
Germany500
Denmark120
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1110
Ireland500
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia010
Netherlands330
Poland100
Portugal200
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 592 members

No vote recorded, 127

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 127 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote264 for, 292 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Greens, Patriots, ECRr · shared0.94 477 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.94 495 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 503 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 491 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 499 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote293 for, 343 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.92 528 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote251 for, 296 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 469 voters
17 Jun 2025Separate vote on paragraph 33 Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in SevilleSeparate vote303 for, 328 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&D, Renewr · shared0.92 547 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote281 for, 324 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.92 510 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 48 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote281 for, 350 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.92 525 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176903
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Separate vote: paragraph 2 — Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023”. Vote, 22 May 2025. votingId 176903, reference 2025/2027(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176903 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 22 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-22/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-22-176903,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Separate vote: paragraph 2 — Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-22},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176903}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-22/176903},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176903, reference 2025/2027(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-22-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-22 (CC BY 4.0)}
}