Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Request by the PfE Group

Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group

Vote
Request by the PfE Group
Decision
No. 2 of the sitting of 21 May 2025
Result
132 for · 334 against · 5 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
21 May 2025, 17:03
More facts (3)
Effect
Rejected — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Vote id
176944
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 132 for, 334 against, 5 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 28 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Rejected.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 33Abst. 0No vote 13 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 1Against 39Abst. 0No vote 13 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
S&DFor 0Against 88Abst. 1No vote 47 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 31 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 4Against 130Abst. 1No vote 53 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 36Against 0Abst. 2No vote 42 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 23 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 12Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 0Abst. 1No vote 11 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Germany800
Hungary100
Lithuania100
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 471 members

No vote recorded, 248

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 248 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 5, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 422 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 395 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment182 for, 415 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 392 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital E Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment186 for, 423 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 396 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 400 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 12 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment181 for, 417 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 390 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 7 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment200 for, 433 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 425 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 17 Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025Amendment197 for, 421 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 408 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 26 to paragraph 122 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment215 for, 426 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 424 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 20 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment191 for, 462 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 29 %r · shared0.97 435 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 89 to paragraph 252, after point xiii Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment213 for, 443 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 442 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 1 connection: The decision

The decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-21/176944
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Request by the PfE Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group”. Vote, 21 May 2025. votingId 176944. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-21/176944 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-21/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-21-176944,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Request by the PfE Group — Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-21/176944}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-21/176944},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176944. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}