Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 270 to article 7, paragraph 9

Screening of foreign investments in the Union

Vote
Amendment 270 to article 7, paragraph 9
Result
176 for · 382 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:26
More facts (6)
Position
vote 31 of 70 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D
Official label
A10-0061/2025 - Raphaël Glucksmann - Article 7, § 9 - Am 270S
Vote id
176176
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 176 for, 382 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 31 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 30Abst. 0No vote 16 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 108Abst. 0No vote 27 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 0Against 62Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 7Against 131Abst. 6No vote 44 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ECRFor 65Against 0Abst. 3No vote 12 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
PatriotsFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 9Against 3Abst. 4No vote 13 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Germany080
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0100
Ireland060
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 572 members

No vote recorded, 147

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 147 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment194 for, 434 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, S&Dr · shared0.96 516 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience FacilityAmendment188 for, 457 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 530 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment204 for, 438 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 519 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment208 for, 431 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.96 517 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 54 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment185 for, 423 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.96 537 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment192 for, 442 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, S&Dr · shared0.95 519 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment208 for, 401 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 499 voters
11 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single marketAmendment201 for, 399 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 495 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 76 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment187 for, 437 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.95 544 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment188 for, 449 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 516 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 270 to article 7, paragraph 9 — Screening of foreign investments in the Union”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176176, reference 2024/0017(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176176 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176176,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 270 to article 7, paragraph 9 — Screening of foreign investments in the Union}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176176}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176176},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176176, reference 2024/0017(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}