Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 121

Screening of foreign investments in the Union

Vote
Amendment 121
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
358 for · 208 against · 7 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:23
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 70 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Greens · separate vote: ECR, Patriots
Official label
A10-0061/2025 - Raphaël Glucksmann - Amendements de la commission compétente - votes séparés et votes par division - Am 121
Text
Report A-10-2025-0061
Dossier
2024/0017(COD)
Vote id
176168
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 62 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 30Abst. 0No vote 16 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 107Against 3Abst. 0No vote 26 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 136Against 0Abst. 6No vote 46 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 13 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 14Abst. 1No vote 11 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria030
Czechia010
Germany0140
France010
Hungary010
Poland010
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 573 members

No vote recorded, 146

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 146 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Final392 for, 219 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.94 501 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 102 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment414 for, 215 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.94 510 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 7 — part 2 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote420 for, 222 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 541 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldFinal420 for, 220 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.92 525 voters
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 17 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSeparate vote434 for, 235 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 532 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 9 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote413 for, 237 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by ESN, Patriotsr · shared0.92 529 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 97 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment413 for, 220 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.92 511 voters
7 May 2025Final vote Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsFinal412 for, 245 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.92 565 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.92 530 voters
9 Oct 2025Paragraph 9 — part 3 United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructureSplit vote356 for, 218 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 58 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 506 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176168
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 121 — Screening of foreign investments in the Union”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176168, reference 2024/0017(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176168 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176168,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 121 — Screening of foreign investments in the Union}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176168}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176168},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176168, reference 2024/0017(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}