Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 5 — part 1, after Article 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 Article 6a (c), after paragraph 5

The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season

Vote
Amendment 5 — part 1, after Article 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 Article 6a (c), after paragraph 5
Result
92 for · 472 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 30 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: Greens
Official label
A10-0079/2025 - Borys Budka - Après l'article 1 Règlement (UE) 2017/1938; Article 6 bis, après le § 5 - Am 5/1
Vote id
176115
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 92 for, 472 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 16 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Notwithstanding paragraph 1 and without prejudice to the obligation of other Member States to fill the underground gas storage facilities concerned, Member States may decide to deviate by up to four percentage points, from the filling target set out in paragraph 1 for each Member State if, under prior approval of the measure by the European Commission, they deploy gas demand reduction measures,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 26Against 1Abst. 2No vote 17 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 7Against 102Abst. 0No vote 27 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
RenewFor 1Against 62Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 141Abst. 0No vote 46 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 2Against 65Abst. 0No vote 13 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 6Against 68Abst. 0No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 1No vote 6 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 1Against 13Abst. 4No vote 11 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Germany080
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0100
Ireland150
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden030
Slovenia010
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 571 members

No vote recorded, 148

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 148 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 205 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 532 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 511 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.87 514 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 87 to paragraph 52 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment106 for, 489 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.86 492 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Amendment 199 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 542 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.86 515 voters
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.86 457 voters
23 Oct 2025Proposal to reject the text Dates of application and transitional provisions for chemical productsRejection93 for, 431 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.85 433 voters
13 Nov 2025Proposal to reject the text Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection105 for, 529 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.85 517 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.85 516 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 185 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment96 for, 541 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.84 514 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 455 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 5 — part 1, after Article 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 Article 6a (c), after paragraph 5 — The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176115, reference 2025/0051(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176115 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176115,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 5 — part 1, after Article 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 Article 6a (c), after paragraph 5 — The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176115}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176115},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176115, reference 2025/0051(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}