Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to article 1, après l'alinéa 1 Règlement (UE) 2017/1938; Article 6 bis, paragraph 1, alinéa 1

The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season

Vote
Amendment 4 to article 1, après l'alinéa 1 Règlement (UE) 2017/1938; Article 6 bis, paragraph 1, alinéa 1
Decision
No. 3 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
75 for · 465 against · 32 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 2 of 30 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
A10-0079/2025 - Borys Budka - Article 1, après l'alinéa 1 Règlement (UE) 2017/1938; Article 6 bis, § 1, alinéa 1 - Am 4
Text
Report A-10-2025-0079
Dossier
2025/0051(COD)
Vote id
176112
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 75 for, 465 against, 32 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 13 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 27Against 1Abst. 2No vote 16 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
GreensFor 45Against 0Abst. 3No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 1Against 106Abst. 3No vote 26 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
RenewFor 0Against 63Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 0Against 143Abst. 0No vote 45 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 1Against 64Abst. 0No vote 15 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 54Abst. 19No vote 12 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.61
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 2No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 1Against 14Abst. 3No vote 11 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria010
Belgium030
Bulgaria030
Germany080
Denmark030
Estonia020
Spain010
Finland030
France0100
Ireland060
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden030
Slovenia010
Slovakia050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 572 members

No vote recorded, 147

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 147 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Proposal to reject the text Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Rejection81 for, 473 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 14 %r · shared0.93 459 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 201 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 545 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.91 515 voters
12 Mar 2026Amendment 5 to Annex, point b Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 466 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.91 457 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Amendment 4 to Annex, point a Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Amendment81 for, 468 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 459 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 176 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 545 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 517 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 185 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment96 for, 541 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.90 515 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 199 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment92 for, 542 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 516 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 184 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment99 for, 533 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 515 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 205 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment94 for, 532 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.89 512 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 177 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment95 for, 543 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.88 515 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176112
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 4 to article 1, après l'alinéa 1 Règlement (UE) 2017/1938; Article 6 bis, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 — The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 176112, reference 2025/0051(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176112 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-176112,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to article 1, après l'alinéa 1 Règlement (UE) 2017/1938; Article 6 bis, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 — The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176112}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/176112},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176112, reference 2025/0051(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}