Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Final vote

Final vote

Screening of foreign investments in the Union

Vote
Final vote
Decision
No. 4 of the sitting of 8 May 2025
Result
378 for · 173 against · 24 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
8 May 2025, 13:32
More facts (6)
Effect
Passed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 69 of 70 on the decision
Official label
A10-0061/2025 - Raphaël Glucksmann - Proposition de la Commission
Text
Report A-10-2025-0061
Dossier
2024/0017(COD)
Vote id
175667
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 378 for, 173 against, 24 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 66 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Passed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 18Against 8Abst. 4No vote 16 of 46Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 106Against 0Abst. 3No vote 27 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 63Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 138Against 0Abst. 6No vote 44 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 2Against 62Abst. 3No vote 13 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.89
PatriotsFor 0Against 74Abst. 0No vote 11 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 3Against 7Abst. 8No vote 11 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria300
Belgium300
Bulgaria300
Cyprus100
Czechia500
Germany2200
Denmark200
Estonia200
Spain1600
Finland100
France400
Greece100
Croatia400
Hungary006
Ireland400
Italy800
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands600
Poland2200
Portugal500
Romania1000
Sweden500
Slovenia300
Slovakia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 575 members

No vote recorded, 144

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 144 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 6 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseSeparate vote418 for, 210 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 510 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 514 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 66 %r · shared0.93 524 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Stock-taking of the European elections 2024Final388 for, 186 against, 34 abstained Adopted For 64 %r · shared0.93 498 voters
22 Jan 2026Recital Q — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote421 for, 150 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 499 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 517 voters
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 15 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldSplit vote434 for, 195 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 532 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 65 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.93 510 voters
22 Jan 2026Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in LithuaniaSplit vote430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.93 498 voters
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseFinal347 for, 165 against, 25 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by The Left, Renewr · shared0.93 434 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/175667
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Final vote — Screening of foreign investments in the Union”. Vote, 8 May 2025. votingId 175667, reference 2024/0017(COD). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/175667 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 8 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-08/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-08-175667,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Final vote — Screening of foreign investments in the Union}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-08},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/175667}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-08/175667},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175667, reference 2024/0017(COD). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-08-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-08 (CC BY 4.0)}
}