Skip to content

Vote · Final vote

Request for urgent procedure

Amending of the ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review

Vote
Request for urgent procedure
Result
316 for · 291 against · 27 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:23
More facts (4)
Effect
Urgent procedure agreed — this vote decided the decision
Position
vote 1 of 1 on the decision
Official label
C10-0063/2025 – Request for an urgent decision
Vote id
176090
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 316 for, 291 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 50 % of the votes cast were for.

This was the final vote on the decision: Urgent procedure agreed.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 40Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 15Against 99Abst. 0No vote 22 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
RenewFor 0Against 54Abst. 13No vote 8 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.71
EPPFor 162Against 1Abst. 6No vote 19 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 62Against 0Abst. 7No vote 11 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
PatriotsFor 64Against 15Abst. 0No vote 6 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.72
ESNFor 1Against 20Abst. 0No vote 5 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 11Against 13Abst. 1No vote 5 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia700
Denmark100
Spain500
France2900
Greece100
Hungary900
Italy700
Latvia100
Netherlands060
Poland200
Portugal200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 634 members

No vote recorded, 85

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 85 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 25 to citation 2 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment238 for, 303 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 544 voters
24 Feb 2026Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 5 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment272 for, 243 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 47 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.83 515 voters
20 Jan 2026Amendment 1 to recital A Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economiesAmendment288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 572 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
26 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Access to finance for SMEs and scale-upsFinal360 for, 298 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 54 %r · shared0.81 590 voters
24 Feb 2026Amendment 20, adding text after recital F Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for UkraineAmendment263 for, 273 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 519 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 45 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment258 for, 323 against, 80 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.81 625 voters
28 Nov 2024Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 1 Recommendation on smoke- and aerosol-free environmentsAmendment241 for, 297 against, 25 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.80 497 voters
15 Dec 2025Monday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group (epizootic) Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group (epizootic)Other240 for, 194 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 55 %r · shared0.80 390 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14 The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equalityAmendment348 for, 282 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.80 568 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 15 — part 2 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of AuditorsAmendment350 for, 269 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.79 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Request for urgent procedure — Amending of the ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 176090. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/176090 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-176090,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Request for urgent procedure — Amending of the ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/176090}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/176090},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 176090. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}