Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 23 — part 2

Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Auditors

Vote
Paragraph 23 — part 2
Result
537 for · 101 against · 23 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:45
More facts (6)
Position
vote 9 of 16 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0047/2025 – Dick Erixon – § 23/2
Vote id
175922
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 537 for, 101 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 81 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘to enhance Luxembourg’s appeal to prospective staff through identified measures, such as higher relocation allowances, housing allowances to mitigate high rental costs for lower-grade staff and reasonably priced temporary housing for short stays to make employment in Luxembourg more attractive;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 33Against 5Abst. 2No vote 6 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 127Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 66Against 4Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 162Against 2Abst. 7No vote 17 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
ECRFor 66Against 5Abst. 4No vote 5 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 7Against 75Abst. 1No vote 2 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
ESNFor 18Against 2Abst. 0No vote 6 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.85
No groupFor 9Against 8Abst. 9No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium101
Cyprus100
Germany300
Denmark001
Spain300
Finland300
France350
Greece400
Ireland200
Italy1000
Portugal100
Sweden200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 661 members

No vote recorded, 58

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 58 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Oct 202510-11 November Parliament’s calendar of part-sessions – 2027Other537 for, 88 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.80 587 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 51 — part 1 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeSplit vote476 for, 88 against, 50 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 606 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 2 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersSplit vote524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 86 %r · shared0.78 552 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.78 600 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: AgenciesFinal503 for, 121 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.75 642 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection SupervisorFinal548 for, 74 against, 42 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.75 656 voters
17 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Bosnia and HerzegovinaFinal478 for, 116 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 74 %r · shared0.75 586 voters
18 Jun 2025Final vote — text as a whole 2023 and 2024 reports on MoldovaFinal456 for, 118 against, 51 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.75 578 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social CommitteeFinal532 for, 120 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.74 654 voters
7 May 2025Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Committee of the RegionsFinal548 for, 110 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 82 %r · shared0.74 659 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 9 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 23 — part 2 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Auditors”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175922, reference 2024/2023(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175922 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175922,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 23 — part 2 — Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Auditors}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175922}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175922},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175922, reference 2024/2023(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}