Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 15, after paragraph 18

Discharge 2023: Agencies

Vote
Amendment 15, after paragraph 18
Decision
No. 14 of the sitting of 7 May 2025
Result
213 for · 421 against · 7 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 14:02
More facts (6)
Position
vote 44 of 106 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
A10-0065/2025 – Erik Marquardt – After § 18 – Am 15
Text
Report A-10-2025-0065
Dossier
2024/2030(DEC)
Vote id
175865
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 213 for, 421 against, 7 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 33 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 41Abst. 0No vote 5 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 46Abst. 0No vote 7 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 116Abst. 1No vote 19 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 3Against 66Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 22Against 146Abst. 0No vote 20 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.80
ECRFor 75Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 82Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 85Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 21Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 6Abst. 6No vote 8 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus010
Czechia200
Germany126
France100
Greece130
Romania100
Slovakia400

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

No vote recorded, 78

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 78 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.98 557 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 492 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment201 for, 448 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 584 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 131 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment202 for, 431 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 619 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment213 for, 450 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 605 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 70 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing worldAmendment206 for, 431 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Members, Patriotsr · shared0.97 619 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 52, adding text after paragraph 11 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment212 for, 448 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 603 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 68 to paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment195 for, 450 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 625 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment206 for, 453 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 603 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 12 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment195 for, 466 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&D, Patriotsr · shared0.97 601 voters
18 Jun 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 50 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportAmendment201 for, 420 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D, Membersr · shared0.97 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175865
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 15, after paragraph 18 — Discharge 2023: Agencies”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175865, reference 2024/2030(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175865 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175865,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 15, after paragraph 18 — Discharge 2023: Agencies}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175865}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175865},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175865, reference 2024/2030(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}