Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 — part 2 to paragraph 102

Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Vote
Amendment 4 — part 2 to paragraph 102
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 7 May 2025
Result
484 for · 20 against · 143 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:56
More facts (6)
Position
vote 21 of 23 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left · split vote: Renew
Official label
A10-0051/2025 – Tomáš Zdechovský – § 102 – Am 4/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0051
Dossier
2024/2029(DEC)
Vote id
175734
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 484 for, 20 against, 143 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 75 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “welcomes the efforts undertaken by the Ukrainian authorities on anti-corruption measures,”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 0Abst. 0No vote 13 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 165Against 0Abst. 3No vote 20 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 14Against 1Abst. 60No vote 5 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.70
PatriotsFor 16Against 9Abst. 54No vote 6 of 85Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.53
ESNFor 1Against 2Abst. 19No vote 4 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.80
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 7No vote 4 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria003
Czechia100
Germany0112
France001
Hungary010
Lithuania001
Poland001
Slovakia001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 647 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

The minority on this vote was under 10 % of the votes cast — too small to compare how it split the chamber.

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175734
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 4 — part 2 to paragraph 102 — Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175734, reference 2024/2029(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175734 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175734,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 — part 2 to paragraph 102 — Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175734}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175734},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175734, reference 2024/2029(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}