Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 95 — part 2

Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Vote: Paragraph 95 — part 2
Decision: No. 13 of the sitting of 7 May 2025
Result: 441 for · 199 against · 18 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 7 May 2025, 13:55

More facts (6)

Position: vote 14 of 23 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label: A10-0051/2025 – Tomáš Zdechovský – § 95/2
Text: Report A-10-2025-0051
Dossier: 2024/2029(DEC)
Vote id: 175727

Position: vote 14 of 23 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Patriots · split vote: Patriots
Official label: A10-0051/2025 – Tomáš Zdechovský – § 95/2
Text: Report A-10-2025-0051
Dossier: 2024/2029(DEC)
Vote id: 175727

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 67 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission to closely monitor Member States’ level of cooperation with the EPPO and urges the Commission to initiate infringement proceedings against any Member State that systematically obstructs EPPO-led investigations; takes the view that membership of the EPPO should be a precondition for receiving Union funds;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 38	Against 1	Abst. 2	No vote 5 of 46	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.89
Greens	For 48	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 5 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 125	Against 0	Abst. 1	No vote 10 of 136	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.99
Renew	For 68	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 75	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
EPP	For 154	Against 9	Abst. 6	No vote 19 of 188	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.87
ECR	For 1	Against 73	Abst. 2	No vote 4 of 80	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.94
Patriots	For 1	Against 82	Abst. 0	No vote 2 of 85	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.98
ESN	For 0	Against 20	Abst. 1	No vote 5 of 26	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.93
No group	For 6	Against 14	Abst. 6	No vote 4 of 30	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	1–0–0	4–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–0	1–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	1–1–0
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	5–0–0	0–3–0	1–8–0	0–1–0	0–2–0
Germany	4–0–0	13–0–0	11–0–1	8–0–0	27–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–12–0	1–2–6
Denmark	0–0–1	3–0–0	3–0–0	3–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	3–0–0	3–0–0	18–0–0	1–0–0	21–0–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Finland	3–0–0	2–0–0	1–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	5–0–0	13–0–0	12–0–0	6–0–0	0–4–0	0–29–0	0–0–1	1–0–0
Greece	4–0–0	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–0–2	0–1–0	no member voted	2–2–0
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	0–0–3	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	1–6–0	no member voted	0–10–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	1–0–1	no member voted	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	10–0–0	4–0–0	20–0–0	no member voted	8–0–0	0–23–0	0–7–0	no member voted	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	0–3–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	no member voted	6–0–0	4–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–2	0–1–0	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	21–1–0	0–19–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Portugal	0–1–0	no member voted	6–0–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	no member voted	0–2–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	1–0–0	10–0–0	3–0–0	9–0–1	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	6–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0	0–6–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Abst.
Austria	5	0
Belgium	4	0
Bulgaria	2	0
Cyprus	1	0
Germany	11	1
Denmark	3	0
Estonia	2	0
Spain	18	0
Finland	1	0
France	13	0
Greece	3	0
Croatia	3	0
Hungary	2	0
Ireland	1	0
Italy	20	0
Lithuania	2	0
Luxembourg	1	0
Latvia	1	0
Malta	3	0
Netherlands	4	0
Poland	3	0
Portugal	6	0
Romania	10	0
Sweden	5	0
Slovenia	1	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 658 members

No vote recorded, 61

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 61 members

Name · group that day · country

Alma EZCURRA ALMANSA group that day: EPP · Spain
Alvise PÉREZ group that day: No group · Spain
Anja HAZEKAMP group that day: The Left · Netherlands
Arno BAUSEMER group that day: ESN · Germany
Assita KANKO group that day: ECR · Belgium
Bernard GUETTA group that day: Renew · France
Bernd LANGE group that day: S&D · Germany
Bruno GONÇALVES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Catarina MARTINS group that day: The Left · Portugal
Charles GOERENS group that day: Renew · Luxembourg
Dario NARDELLA group that day: S&D · Italy
Davor Ivo STIER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: ESN · Poland
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Grzegorz BRAUN group that day: No group · Poland
Hana JALLOUL MURO group that day: S&D · Spain
Hildegard BENTELE group that day: EPP · Germany
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Ivars IJABS group that day: Renew · Latvia
Javier MORENO SÁNCHEZ group that day: S&D · Spain
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Jutta PAULUS group that day: Greens · Germany
Katarina BARLEY group that day: S&D · Germany
Krzysztof BREJZA group that day: EPP · Poland
Lena DÜPONT group that day: EPP · Germany
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Luke Ming FLANAGAN group that day: The Left · Ireland
Malik AZMANI group that day: Renew · Netherlands
Manfred WEBER group that day: EPP · Germany
Maria GRAPINI group that day: S&D · Romania
Maria GUZENINA group that day: S&D · Finland
Marjan ŠAREC group that day: Renew · Slovenia
Markéta GREGOROVÁ group that day: Greens · Czechia
Marko VEŠLIGAJ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Marta TEMIDO group that day: S&D · Portugal
Martine KEMP group that day: EPP · Luxembourg
Michał DWORCZYK group that day: ECR · Poland
Mika AALTOLA group that day: EPP · Finland
Milan UHRÍK group that day: ESN · Slovakia
Pál SZEKERES group that day: Patriots · Hungary
Pekka TOVERI group that day: EPP · Finland
Radan KANEV group that day: EPP · Bulgaria
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ group that day: EPP · Lithuania
Reinhold LOPATKA group that day: EPP · Austria
René AUST group that day: ESN · Germany
Rima HASSAN group that day: The Left · France
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Sabine VERHEYEN group that day: EPP · Germany
Sara MATTHIEU group that day: Greens · Belgium
Sebastião BUGALHO group that day: EPP · Portugal
Sergey LAGODINSKY group that day: Greens · Germany
Sibylle BERG group that day: No group · Germany
Sigrid FRIIS group that day: Renew · Denmark
Sophia KIRCHER group that day: EPP · Austria
Sophie WILMÈS group that day: Renew · Belgium
Stanisław TYSZKA group that day: ESN · Poland
Susanna CECCARDI group that day: Patriots · Italy
Tomislav SOKOL group that day: EPP · Croatia
Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ group that day: Greens · Spain
Željana ZOVKO group that day: EPP · Croatia

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
23 Oct 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)	Separate vote	383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.95 525 voters
22 Jan 2026	Paragraph 10 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania	Split vote	427 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.94 556 voters
22 Jan 2026	Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania	Split vote	419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.94 551 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
22 Jan 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure	Amendment	426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by Patriots, Renew	r · shared0.94 577 voters
29 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission	Final	418 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted	For 65 %		r · shared0.94 578 voters
23 Oct 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 9 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)	Separate vote	385 for, 178 against, 7 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.94 523 voters
22 Jan 2026	Paragraph 11 — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania	Split vote	430 for, 157 against, 20 abstained Adopted	For 71 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.94 555 voters
25 Nov 2025	Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is founded	Separate vote	418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted	For 66 %	Requested by S&D	r · shared0.93 580 voters
29 Apr 2026	Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.93 570 voters
18 Jun 2025	Paragraph 85 — part 3 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law report	Split vote	424 for, 191 against, 30 abstained Adopted	For 66 %		r · shared0.93 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office Budget decision · report by Tomáš Zdechovský 7 May 2025 Discharge decision adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Final vote Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025 Discharge decision adopted
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Paragraph 8 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Paragraph 18 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Paragraph 18 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Paragraph 93 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 96 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 96 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025
Vote Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office — Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 96 Roll-call vote · 7 May 2025 7 May 2025

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175727
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 95 — part 2 — Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175727, reference 2024/2029(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175727 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175727,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 95 — part 2 — Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175727}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175727},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175727, reference 2024/2029(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}