Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 18 — part 2

Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Vote
Paragraph 18 — part 2
Decision
No. 13 of the sitting of 7 May 2025
Result
459 for · 171 against · 27 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
7 May 2025, 13:54
More facts (6)
Position
vote 7 of 23 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Patriots
Official label
A10-0051/2025 – Tomáš Zdechovský – § 18/2
Text
Report A-10-2025-0051
Dossier
2024/2029(DEC)
Vote id
175720
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 459 for, 171 against, 27 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “notes with concern that in several instances Member States have been declaring criminal offences affecting the financial interests of the Union as national cases, which are within the competence of the EPPO;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 1Abst. 2No vote 5 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
GreensFor 48Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 166Against 0Abst. 3No vote 19 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 1Against 69Abst. 6No vote 4 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 10No vote 2 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
ESNFor 0Against 20Abst. 2No vote 4 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
No groupFor 11Against 8Abst. 4No vote 7 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group, Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria100
Cyprus010
Czechia020
Germany711
France100
Greece220
Romania010
Slovakia013

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 657 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 597 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 59 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 595 voters
23 Oct 2025Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)Separate vote383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 526 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on recital AA Public procurementSeparate vote430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.95 570 voters
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 86 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 591 voters
9 Sept 2025Recital AH — part 2 of 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 592 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 38 — part 2 Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU importsSplit vote480 for, 196 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.95 625 voters
19 Jun 2025Recital R — part 3 Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy systemSplit vote396 for, 163 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.95 532 voters
10 Mar 2026Recital N — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote443 for, 161 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.95 569 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 40 — part 2 Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU importsSplit vote480 for, 197 against, 13 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.95 634 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175720
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 18 — part 2 — Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office”. Vote, 7 May 2025. votingId 175720, reference 2024/2029(DEC). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175720 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 May 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-05-07/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-05-07-175720,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 18 — part 2 — Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-05-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175720}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-05-07/175720},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 175720, reference 2024/2029(DEC). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-05-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-05-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}