Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 16 — part 3 to paragraph 7

Energy-intensive industries

Vote
Amendment 16 — part 3 to paragraph 7
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 3 Apr 2025
Result
386 for · 211 against · 9 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
3 April 2025, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 36 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members, Greens · split vote: Greens
Official label
B10-0209/2025 - § 7 - Am 16/3
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0209
Dossier
2025/2536(RSP)
Vote id
174685
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 386 for, 211 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “technology neutral”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 36Abst. 0No vote 10 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 3Against 114Abst. 0No vote 19 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 62Against 2Abst. 0No vote 11 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 153Against 1Abst. 0No vote 34 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 64Against 0Abst. 1No vote 15 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 69Against 6Abst. 0No vote 11 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.88
ESNFor 21Against 1Abst. 2No vote 2 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 14Against 1Abst. 6No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany030
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Ireland030
Italy070
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 606 members

No vote recorded, 112

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 112 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote Amending Directives (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards the dates from which Member States are to apply certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural427 for, 221 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.93 574 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 578 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 8 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment435 for, 236 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.92 582 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Referral back to committee Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsProcedural426 for, 202 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.90 539 voters
6 Jul 2026Monday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Italy and Denmark Final vote Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and DenmarkOther283 for, 142 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %r · shared0.90 366 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 4 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment423 for, 232 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 581 voters
11 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacksFinal355 for, 173 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.90 468 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 17 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment439 for, 232 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 580 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroFinal374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.89 498 voters
26 Nov 2025Amendments 64 + 129 (voted as one) to Article 1 Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and tradersAmendment442 for, 216 against, 3 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 557 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174685
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 16 — part 3 to paragraph 7 — Energy-intensive industries”. Vote, 3 April 2025. votingId 174685, reference 2025/2536(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174685 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 3 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 3 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-03, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-03/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-03-174685,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 16 — part 3 to paragraph 7 — Energy-intensive industries}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-03},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174685}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174685},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174685, reference 2025/2536(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-03 (CC BY 4.0)}
}