Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 17, after paragraph 14

Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III

Vote
Amendment 17, after paragraph 14
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 2 Apr 2025
Result
318 for · 246 against · 114 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
2 April 2025, 13:16
More facts (6)
Position
vote 39 of 101 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, The Left
Official label
A10-0042/2025 – Andrzej Halicki – After § 14 – Am 17
Text
Report A-10-2025-0042
Dossier
2024/2110(BUI)
Vote id
174603
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 318 for, 246 against, 114 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 47 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 41Against 2Abst. 0No vote 3 of 46Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
GreensFor 22Against 1Abst. 28No vote 2 of 53Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.32
S&DFor 123Against 7Abst. 0No vote 6 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
RenewFor 59Against 8Abst. 4No vote 4 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.75
EPPFor 52Against 123Abst. 3No vote 10 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
ECRFor 4Against 54Abst. 20No vote 2 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.54
PatriotsFor 0Against 30Abst. 50No vote 6 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.44
ESNFor 1Against 19Abst. 4No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.69
No groupFor 16Against 2Abst. 5No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia027
Denmark001
Spain050
France0027
Greece001
Hungary0010
Italy080
Latvia001
Netherlands060
Poland001
Portugal002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 678 members

No vote recorded, 40

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 40 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Recital G — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote279 for, 238 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.75 519 voters
21 May 2026Paragraph 37 — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSplit vote245 for, 275 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Members, S&Dr · shared0.73 508 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital AC Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote276 for, 317 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 574 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 86 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote273 for, 324 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 580 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 68 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote262 for, 309 against, 33 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.71 569 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 10 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote295 for, 302 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 570 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 36 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 559 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 83 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote272 for, 320 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 576 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital G — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote252 for, 258 against, 43 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.71 523 voters
12 Feb 2026Separate vote on recital P Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSeparate vote267 for, 261 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.70 518 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174603
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 17, after paragraph 14 — Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III”. Vote, 2 April 2025. votingId 174603, reference 2024/2110(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174603 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-02/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-02-174603,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 17, after paragraph 14 — Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174603}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174603},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174603, reference 2024/2110(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02 (CC BY 4.0)}
}