Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 58, after paragraph 12

Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III

Vote
Amendment 58, after paragraph 12
Decision
No. 5 of the sitting of 2 Apr 2025
Result
195 for · 466 against · 9 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
2 April 2025, 13:15
More facts (6)
Position
vote 34 of 101 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: S&D, Patriots
Official label
A10-0042/2025 – Andrzej Halicki – After § 12 – Am 58
Text
Report A-10-2025-0042
Dossier
2024/2110(BUI)
Vote id
174599
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 195 for, 466 against, 9 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 29 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 44Abst. 0No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 131Abst. 0No vote 5 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 69Abst. 3No vote 3 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
EPPFor 9Against 161Abst. 2No vote 16 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 78Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 23Against 0Abst. 1No vote 2 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 11Against 10Abst. 1No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain040
Finland020
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 670 members

No vote recorded, 48

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 48 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 59 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAmendment194 for, 467 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.98 611 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 492 Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment201 for, 448 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.98 607 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 446 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.98 615 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
7 May 2025Amendment 68 to paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment195 for, 450 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greens, Patriotsr · shared0.97 620 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 3 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment192 for, 456 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 619 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 34 to paragraph 108 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment200 for, 448 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.97 615 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAmendment207 for, 410 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.97 583 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 43 Discharge 2024: AgenciesAmendment198 for, 438 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 594 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 18 Discharge 2023: AgenciesAmendment213 for, 421 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.97 601 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 20 — part 3 2023 and 2024 reports on AlbaniaAmendment208 for, 460 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 635 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174599
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 58, after paragraph 12 — Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III”. Vote, 2 April 2025. votingId 174599, reference 2024/2110(BUI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174599 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-02/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-02-174599,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 58, after paragraph 12 — Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section III}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174599}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174599},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174599, reference 2024/2110(BUI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02 (CC BY 4.0)}
}