Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 12 to recital Q

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024

Vote
Amendment 12 to recital Q
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 2 Apr 2025
Result
141 for · 464 against · 70 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
2 April 2025, 13:59
More facts (6)
Position
vote 212 of 231 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ESN
Official label
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – recital Q – Am 12
Text
Report A-10-2025-0010
Dossier
2024/2080(INI)
Vote id
174470
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 141 for, 464 against, 70 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 4No vote 4 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 132Abst. 0No vote 4 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 71Abst. 1No vote 3 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 4Against 163Abst. 6No vote 15 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 15Against 4Abst. 58No vote 3 of 80Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.63
PatriotsFor 80Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 86Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 24Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 26Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 5Abst. 1No vote 4 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium020
Czechia010
Germany0130
Denmark030
Spain040
Finland020
France050
Croatia010
Italy040
Lithuania010
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands060
Romania010
Sweden030
Slovenia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 675 members

No vote recorded, 43

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 43 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 Public procurementAmendment145 for, 439 against, 59 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.94 603 voters
9 Mar 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther87 for, 291 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 22 %r · shared0.94 378 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 401 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment131 for, 447 against, 72 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriots, S&Dr · shared0.94 610 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
23 Jan 2025Amendment 1, adding text after recital D Case of Boualem Sansal in AlgeriaAmendment113 for, 431 against, 64 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 577 voters
9 Sept 2025Amendment 39, adding text after recital R Public procurementAmendment142 for, 420 against, 78 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 600 voters
8 Jul 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 60 2025 Commission report on UkraineAmendment166 for, 444 against, 35 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriots, ESN, EPPr · shared0.93 603 voters
31 Mar 2025Tuesday's agenda — Request by the PfE Group Final vote Tuesday's agenda – Request by the PfE GroupOther118 for, 326 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 26 %r · shared0.93 433 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 4, adding text after recital I EU-Uzbekistan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (resolution)Amendment122 for, 454 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 607 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 32 to paragraph 12 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentAmendment133 for, 445 against, 75 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 605 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 63, adding text after paragraph 21 Guidelines for the 2026 budget – Section IIIAmendment127 for, 497 against, 54 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 666 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174470
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 12 to recital Q — Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024”. Vote, 2 April 2025. votingId 174470, reference 2024/2080(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174470 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-02/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-02-174470,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 12 to recital Q — Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174470}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174470},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174470, reference 2024/2080(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02 (CC BY 4.0)}
}