Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 44 — part 2

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024

Vote
Paragraph 44 — part 2
Result
381 for · 275 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
2 April 2025, 13:49
More facts (6)
Position
vote 134 of 231 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR · split vote: ECR
Official label
A10-0010/2025 – David McAllister – § 44/2
Vote id
174420
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 381 for, 275 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 56 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “regrets that the potential for fast, efficient and effective foreign, security and defence action, as provided for, inter alia, by the passerelle clauses of the TEU, has never been used;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 7Against 33Abst. 3No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
GreensFor 51Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 123Against 3Abst. 7No vote 3 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
RenewFor 68Against 4Abst. 0No vote 3 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.92
EPPFor 129Against 37Abst. 6No vote 16 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
ECRFor 0Against 77Abst. 1No vote 2 of 80Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 79Abst. 0No vote 7 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 22Abst. 2No vote 2 of 26Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
No groupFor 3Against 20Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium400
Bulgaria300
Germany700
Denmark400
Estonia200
Spain100
Finland300
France1300
Ireland140
Lithuania200
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands700
Poland100
Portugal200
Romania300
Sweden300
Slovenia200
Slovakia600

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 675 members

No vote recorded, 43

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 43 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
22 Oct 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsFinal310 for, 277 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 48 %r · shared0.86 601 voters
22 Oct 2025Paragraph 4 — part 4 Institutional consequences of the EU enlargement negotiationsSplit vote326 for, 272 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 588 voters
25 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Final330 for, 273 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 51 %r · shared0.84 607 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
8 May 2025Amendment 120 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment361 for, 209 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 547 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 121 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment358 for, 208 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 62 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.83 544 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 119 Screening of foreign investments in the UnionAmendment357 for, 206 against, 6 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriots, Greensr · shared0.83 540 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital J — part 2 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote366 for, 245 against, 30 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 608 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 12 — part 1 Institutional aspects of the report on the future of European competitiveness (Draghi Report)Split vote385 for, 226 against, 35 abstained Adopted For 60 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.83 607 voters
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 80 — part 2 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025Split vote347 for, 289 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPP, ECR, Patriotsr · shared0.83 614 voters
12 Mar 2025Paragraph 58 — part 3 White paper on the future of European defenceSplit vote373 for, 279 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.83 635 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Paragraph 44 — part 2 — Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024”. Vote, 2 April 2025. votingId 174420, reference 2024/2080(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174420 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 2 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-02/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-02-174420,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 44 — part 2 — Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2024}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-02},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174420}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-02/174420},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174420, reference 2024/2080(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-02-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-02 (CC BY 4.0)}
}